Note-Taking That Actually Works
Most notes are useless. They sit in notebooks or folders, never seen again. Expensive paper filled with writing that serves no purpose.
This is one of the great wastes of human effort. Millions of students diligently recording things they’ll never review.
Good notes aren’t just records-they’re tools for thinking. The act of note-taking, done right, is where learning happens. The notes themselves are almost a byproduct.
Why Most Notes Fail
Problem 1: Transcription mode Writing down what’s said verbatim. No processing, no thinking, just recording. This is what tape recorders do-and they do it better than you.
Problem 2: No review system Notes written once and abandoned. If you never look at notes again, why take them? You’ve created a record for nobody.
Problem 3: No connections Notes isolated by course, topic, or date. Knowledge in silos can’t compound. Each class is a separate universe with no bridges to others.
Problem 4: No retrieval practice Notes that are easy to read but don’t challenge recall. Pretty notes that teach nothing. Aesthetic satisfaction is not the same as learning.
The Cornell Method
Developed at Cornell University in the 1950s. Simple, proven, effective for lecture and reading notes. Still works 70+ years later because it’s based on how learning actually functions, not on fashion.
The Format
Divide your page into three sections: a narrow left column for cues (about 2.5 inches), a wider right column for main notes (about 6 inches), and a summary section across the bottom. The topic and date go at the top.
How to Use It
During class/reading (Main Notes column):
- Record information in your own words-not verbatim
- Use abbreviations and symbols
- Leave gaps for things you missed
- Don’t try to capture everything-focus on concepts and connections
After class (Cue column):
- Write questions that the notes answer
- Add keywords and key terms
- Create prompts for self-testing
- This is where active processing happens-it’s more valuable than the lecture itself
After completing cues (Summary section):
- Write a 2-3 sentence summary
- Forces synthesis of the whole page
- Useful for quick review later
Reviewing:
- Cover the Main Notes column
- Use only the Cue column to test yourself
- Try to answer the questions from memory
- This is built-in active recall-the system does the work for you
Why Cornell Works
- Forces processing during note-taking-no mindless transcription
- Builds in self-testing prompts automatically
- Creates summaries for efficient review
- Separates recording from thinking
- Simple enough to actually use consistently
The Zettelkasten Method
German for “slip box.” A system for connected notes developed by sociologist Niklas Luhmann, who used it to write 70+ books and 400+ articles. This is not normal productivity-this is a system that turned one academic into a writing machine.
The Philosophy
Notes should be:
- Atomic: One idea per note-no more
- Able to stand alone: You can understand them without other context
- Connected: Linked to other notes
- Personal: In your own words, with your own thinking
The goal isn’t to collect information-it’s to develop ideas by connecting them. Your Zettelkasten becomes a thinking partner, a second brain that helps you see relationships you’d never notice otherwise.
How It Works
1. Fleeting Notes Quick captures of ideas, quotes, thoughts. Low effort, temporary. These get processed into permanent notes or deleted. They’re disposable-don’t treat them as precious.
2. Literature Notes When reading something, write notes in your own words. Don’t copy-translate into your understanding. One idea per note. If you can’t explain it in your own words, you don’t understand it yet.
3. Permanent Notes Refined, polished notes that join your knowledge system. Each permanent note:
- Contains one clear idea
- Is written as if explaining to someone else
- Links to related permanent notes
- Has a unique identifier
4. Linking The magic happens in connections. Every new note should link to existing notes. Ask:
- What does this relate to?
- Does this support or contradict something I already know?
- Is this an example of a broader principle?
- Does this solve a problem I’ve been thinking about?
The network of links is where insights emerge. Notes start talking to each other.
Example Zettelkasten Note
ID: 202601291423
Title: Desirable difficulties enhance learning
Challenges that slow initial learning often improve
long-term retention. The effort required to overcome
difficulty signals to the brain that information is
important.
Examples:
- Testing yourself vs. re-reading
- Spacing practice vs. massing
- Interleaving vs. blocked practice
Links:
- [[Testing effect]] - specific type of desirable difficulty
- [[Spacing effect]] - another example
- [[Fluency illusion]] - why easy feels like learning but isn't
- [[Learning vs. performance]] - difficulty hurts performance, helps learning
Source: Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerationsTools for Zettelkasten
Obsidian (free for personal use)
- Markdown-based
- Links that work both ways
- Graph view shows connections
- Works offline, you own your files
Roam Research (paid)
- Made two-way linking popular
- Block-level references
- Daily notes workflow
Logseq (free, open source)
- Similar to Roam
- Outliner-based
- Privacy-focused
Physical index cards
- Luhmann’s original method
- Slower but still works
- No software to learn
Progressive Summarization
Developed by Tiago Forte. A method for making notes useful without excessive upfront effort.
The Layers
When you first capture something, it’s layer 1 (raw).
Layer 1: The original text or your initial notes
Layer 2: Bold the important parts on first review
Layer 3: Highlight the most critical parts of what you bolded
Layer 4: Write an executive summary at the top
Layer 5: Remix-create something new from the material
Why It Works
You don’t over-invest in notes you might never need. Processing happens progressively:
- Most notes stay at layer 1-2
- Important notes get more processing over time
- By the time you need something, it’s ready
Practical Guidelines
For Lectures
- Use Cornell method or modified version
- Write in your own words, not verbatim
- Focus on concepts, not details (you can look up details)
- Leave space for questions and additions
- Review within 24 hours to fill gaps
For Reading
- Don’t take notes on first read-just read
- Second pass: note key ideas in your own words
- Connect new notes to existing knowledge
- One idea per note (Zettelkasten style)
- Include page references for quotes
For Problem Sets
- Don’t just solve-explain your reasoning
- Note common patterns and techniques
- Record mistakes and why they happened
- Create flashcards for problem types
For Research
- Keep literature notes separate from your thinking
- Link sources to your own permanent notes
- Track your questions and ideas separately
- Build concept maps for complex topics
Note-Taking Tools
For simplicity: Plain text files, paper notebooks For Cornell: Any notebook, OneNote, paper templates For Zettelkasten: Obsidian, Roam, Logseq, or good old index cards For collaboration: Notion, Google Docs
The tool matters less than the system. People have built incredible knowledge systems with index cards. Start simple. Add complexity only if you’ve outgrown simplicity.
The Real Secret
The value isn’t in the notes-it’s in the note-taking.
The act of translating information into your own words, connecting it to what you know, and organizing it for future use-that’s the learning. The notes themselves are almost a side effect.
Good systems make this natural. Bad systems make it a chore you avoid.
Start with Cornell for classes. Add Zettelkasten for deep reading and research when you’re ready. Keep it simple enough to actually do consistently. The best system is the one you’ll actually use.
What’s Next
Part 4 covers focus and deep work-how to eliminate distractions, achieve flow states, and do the kind of concentrated thinking that produces real results instead of busy-feeling shallow work.
Enjoyed This?
If this helped something click, subscribe to my YouTube channel. More content like this, same approach - making things stick without insulting your intelligence. It’s free, it helps more people find this stuff, and it tells me what’s worth making more of.